Category:Tibetan Buddhist Philosophy
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(previous page) (next page)
Subcategories
This category has the following 5 subcategories, out of 5 total.
Pages in category "Tibetan Buddhist Philosophy"
The following 32 pages are in this category, out of 256 total.
(previous page) (next page)T
- The term, Emptiness, does not mean Nothing
- The Three Natures
- The Tibetan Buddhist Syllogistic Form
- The Tibetan Institutionalisation of Disputation: Understanding a Medieval Monastic Practice
- The Two Truths—the Key to Unlocking Madhyamaka
- The Word of Chandra
- The Yogacara-Shravaka-Bhumi says
- Their objects appear as individual characteristics. Therefore they are always non-conceptual
- There are four Buddhist philosophical systems:
- These are called the dependency of arising and dependency of imputation of the skandhas
- Third, individual definitions of the four correct reasonings
- This should be understood in three senses
- Through the Lens of Indo-Tibetan Buddhism
- Tibetan Buddhist Philosophy
- Tibetan Developments in Buddhist Logic
- Tibetan Epistemology and Philosophy of Language
- Tibetan Philosophy
- Transitivity, Intransitivity and tha dad pa Verbs in Traditional Tibetan Grammar
- Tsong kha pa et alii on the Bhāviveka-Candrakīrti Debate
- Two Sorts of Consequences
- Two Tibetan Texts on the “Neither One nor Many
W
- Why Use Consequences Rather Than Triply Characterized Reasons? The Problem of Nonexistent Subject Terms and Āśrayāsiddha
- Without benefit," means not having the benefit of truly establishing liberation
- Wrong benefit," or "wrong sense" means falling into the extremes of eternalism and nihilism, saying things injurious to the Dharma and so forth. When these two faults are absent, then Buddhist doctrine is true and possesses benefit