Difference between revisions of "False Aspectarians"
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Ayywar.jpeg|thumb|250px|]] | [[File:Ayywar.jpeg|thumb|250px|]] | ||
| − | '''[[False Aspectarians]]''' (Skt. ''[[nirākāravādin]]''; Tib. {{BigTibetan|[[རྣམ་རྫུན་པ་]]}}, ''[[namdzunpa]]''; [[Wyl.]] ''[[rnam rdzun pa]]'') — a subschool of the [[Chittamatra]]. They say that the aspects of [[mind]] which appear as external are false and that it is only the perceiving [[mind]] which really [[exists]]. They say that [[mental]] aspects which appear as outer [[objects]] are just like the false [[perceptions]] of falling hairs, a yellow [[conch shell]] (to someone with jaundice), or two moons. They say there is only the [[subjective]] [[mind]] and there are no outer [[objects]]. To say that the [[mental images]] (Tib. {{BigTibetan|[[རྣམ་པ་]]}}, ''[[nampa]]''; [[Wyl.]] ''[[rnam pa]]'') are real would mean that a [[person]] must have several [[minds]]. Or, they say, if there is only one [[mind]], how could it produce the plurality of [[perceived]] aspects? Or if there are many [[subjects]] and only one [[object]], that is also problematic, because [[subject]] and [[object]] are dependently originating. | + | '''[[False Aspectarians]]''' (Skt. ''[[nirākāravādin]]''; Tib. {{BigTibetan|[[རྣམ་རྫུན་པ་]]}}, ''[[namdzunpa]]''; [[Wyl.]] ''[[rnam rdzun pa]]'') — a subschool of the [[Chittamatra]]. They say that the aspects of [[mind]] which appear as external are false and that it is only the perceiving [[mind]] which really [[exists]]. They say that [[mental]] aspects which appear as outer [[objects]] are just like the false [[perceptions]] of falling hairs, a [[yellow]] [[conch shell]] (to someone with jaundice), or two moons. They say there is only the [[subjective]] [[mind]] and there are no outer [[objects]]. To say that the [[mental images]] (Tib. {{BigTibetan|[[རྣམ་པ་]]}}, ''[[nampa]]''; [[Wyl.]] ''[[rnam pa]]'') are real would mean that a [[person]] must have several [[minds]]. Or, they say, if there is only one [[mind]], how could it produce the plurality of [[perceived]] aspects? Or if there are many [[subjects]] and only one [[object]], that is also problematic, because [[subject]] and [[object]] are dependently originating. |
==Alternative Translations== | ==Alternative Translations== | ||
Latest revision as of 22:14, 23 November 2020
False Aspectarians (Skt. nirākāravādin; Tib. རྣམ་རྫུན་པ་, namdzunpa; Wyl. rnam rdzun pa) — a subschool of the Chittamatra. They say that the aspects of mind which appear as external are false and that it is only the perceiving mind which really exists. They say that mental aspects which appear as outer objects are just like the false perceptions of falling hairs, a yellow conch shell (to someone with jaundice), or two moons. They say there is only the subjective mind and there are no outer objects. To say that the mental images (Tib. རྣམ་པ་, nampa; Wyl. rnam pa) are real would mean that a person must have several minds. Or, they say, if there is only one mind, how could it produce the plurality of perceived aspects? Or if there are many subjects and only one object, that is also problematic, because subject and object are dependently originating.
Alternative Translations
- Chittamatrins who hold that sense data are false (LCN)
