Articles by alphabetic order
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
 Ā Ī Ñ Ś Ū Ö Ō
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0


Manual of Abhidharma - Reading Ten: The Relative Severity of Deeds and What Causes It

From Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
The-buddha.png
Tibet 004.jpg
2 mple1 400.jpg
560-1920.jpg
47527monks.jpg
4-spddtrek.jpg
BmFu.JPG
10nvm0 n.jpg
6958.jpg

The following selections are from the First Dalai Lama’s commentary to the Treasure House of Knowledge (Abhidharmakosha), entitled Illumination of the Path to Freedom. They include the root text of Master Vasubandhu.


116

The Meritorious Act of Giving

Giving is when anyone acts to give,

Out of a wish to honor or to aid.

Deeds of body and speech with motive, linked;

Its result, possession of great wealth.

[IV.449-52]


Now among these three, giving is described as follows. It is when any person, with thoughts of virtue, acts to give any thing he owns to someone else. As we read in A Sutra Taught at the Request of Vyasa, a Great Adept: “Oh great adept, all acts of giving even the smallest thing from faith are Giving.” As for the motivation involved, it is only the meritorious act of giving when one gives away the thing either out of a wish to honor (some very high object) or out of a wish to aid (some very miserable object). It is not real giving when one does so only out of fear, or out of hopes of getting something in return, and so on.

Giving moreover consists of deeds of body and speech along with their motivation and what is linked with it mentally. The result of the giving is the possession of great wealth, at least for the time being.


117

Giving that Benefits the Other,

and the Rest

Giving is that which benefits oneself,

The other, both, and neither one of them.

[IV.453-4]


As for the different divisions of giving, the first is that giving which benefits oneself. This would be for a person who had not yet freed himself from desire for desire-realm objects, or for a common person who had done so but through the “path of the world,” to make offerings to a shrine.

Giving that benefits the other would be any act of giving performed by a realized person free of desire towards another living being not so freed. This assumes by the way that we do not consider any results that the former individual will experience in this same life.

Giving that benefits both would be for a realized being who was not yet free of desire, or for a common being who was not thus free, to present something to another living being who was not yet free from desire either.

Giving that benefits neither would be for a realized being who was free of desire for the desire realm to make offerings to a shrine. This is because the only point of the offering is for this being to express his deep respect and gratitude. Here again incidentally we are not counting any results of the offering that he will achieve in the same life.


118

Exceptional Types of Givers

Exceptional types of it from exceptional

Givers, given thing, whom given; of these the

Giver’s exceptional through faith and the rest,

Performs his giving with respect and the like.

As a result one gains the honor, a wealthy,

The timely and a freedom from hindrances.

[IV.455-60]

Me1.jpg

Very exceptional types of “it”—of this giving, come from exceptional kinds of givers, exceptional kinds of things which are given, and exceptional kinds of objects to whom the things are given. Of these, the giver is made exceptional through a motivation of faith and “the rest”—which refers first of all to the rest of the “seven riches of realized beings”: morality, generosity, learning, a sense of shame, a conscience, and wisdom. The phrase also refers to having little desire for things.

As for how he undertakes the act, the exceptional giver performs his giving (1) with an attitude of respect and “the like.” These last words refer to handing the object to the other person with one’s own hands; (2) giving something when it is really needed; and (3) performing the actual deed in a way that does no harm to anyone else. Examples would be where one had stolen the object from someone else in the first place, or where one presented a sheep to a butcher. Included here too are cases where the object given hurt the recipient—examples would be giving someone poison or unhealthy food. Concerning the consequences of such giving, the person has performed his charity with an attitude of respect and so on, as listed above. As a result he gains the following (and here the list follows the three numbers above). In his future life he wins (1) the honor and respect of those who follow him, as well as a wealth of material things (which because of his former faith he enjoys at his total discretion). In this next life he also gains (2) the timely fulfillment of his own needs, as well as (3) complete freedom from any hindrances to his wealth: enemies, loss of his things in a fire, and so on.


119

Exceptional Things to Give

Things given, excellent color and such.

From it an excellent form and reputation,

Happiness and a very youthful complexion,

A body which in each time’s pleasant to touch.

[IV.461-4]


An excellent color “and such”—which refers to an excellent smell, or taste, or feel—are what make things that are given exceptional.

From “it” (that is, from giving things with an excellent color), one gains an excellent bodily form—at least for the time being. Temporarily too he gains other results (following the order of the qualities just listed): a good and widespread reputation; great happiness; and a body with a very youthful complexion. The body that one possesses is moreover like that which belongs to the “jewel of the queen”: it is pleasant to touch in each of the times—whether the temperature is just normal, or whether it is cold (when the queen’s body gives you warmth), or hot (at which time the queen feels to you cool).


120

Exceptional Objects to Give a Gift

Exceptional—those you give to—by the being,

Suffering, aid, and by good qualities.

The highest someone freed by someone freed,

By a bodhisattva, or the eighth.

Gifts made to a father or a mother,

To the sick, a spiritual teacher, or

A bodhisattva in his final life

Cannot be measured, even not realized.

[IV.465-72]

LordBuddha 24790.jpg

Those to whom you give a gift can be exceptional by virtue of four different reasons, first by the type of being involved. As Gautami’s Sutra states,

Ananda, you can look forward to a hundredfold result ripening back to you, if you give something to an individual who has reached the animal’s state of birth. But you can look forward to a thousandfold result if you give something even to a human who’s immoral.

The object towards whom you perform your giving may also be distinguished by his suffering. Suppose for example that you take all the things that a person can give in one of those types of acts where the merit derives from a substantial thing. It is stated that if you give these things to a sick person, or to someone nursing a sick person, or to someone when it’s cold outside or whatever, the merit is immeasurable.

The recipient may furthermore be distinguished by the aid he has given one in the past. Here we include one’s father and mother, or anyone else who has been of special help to one. Examples may be found among stories of the Buddha’s former lives, such as the one about the bear and the ru-ru deer. The person to whom one gives his gift may, lastly, be exceptional by virtue of his good qualities. Gautami’s Sutra provides some examples:

If you give to someone who has kept his morality, you can expect it to ripen into a result a hundred thousand times as great. If you give to someone who has entered that stage known as the “result of entering the stream,” it ripens into something which is immeasurable. And if you give even more to someone who has entered the stream, the result is even more immeasurable.

Now the highest kind of giving is for someone who has freed himself of the three realms to give something to someone else who has freed himself as well. This is because both are the highest kind of individual. Again we see, in Gautami’s Sutra,

The highest form of giving a physical thing

Is by one free to another free of desire:

But one with his body and speech restrained,

Reaching out his hand to offer food.

We can also though take a giver who is a bodhisattva and who gives any object at all, for the sake of helping every being alive. Although this is an act of giving by a person who is not yet freed and is directed to another person not yet freed, it is still the highest kind of giving. This is because the act has been performed for the sake of total enlightenment and every living being.

And this is because one has given something in order to become the savior of every single being.

Now a certain sutra gives the following list of eight types of giving:

1) Giving to close ones;

2) Giving out of fear;

3) Giving because they gave to you;

4) Giving because they will give to you;

5) Giving because one’s parents and ancestors used to give;

6) Giving with the hope of attaining one of the higher births;

7) Giving to gain fame;

8) Giving to gain the jewel of the mind, to gain the riches of the mind, to win what great practitioners collect together, to achieve the ultimate goal.

We can alternately describe the highest type of giving as the eighth in this list: giving to gain the jewel of the mind and so on.

As for the meaning of the expression “giving to close ones,” certain masters of the past have claimed that it refers to giving to someone when they are standing close by, or to someone when they approach close by. “Giving out of fear” means that a person decides he will give the best he has, but only because he perceives some great imminent danger to himself. And “giving because they gave to you” refers to giving something to a person with the thought that “I’m doing this because he gave me something before.”

The remaining members of the list are easily understood. “Jewel of the mind” refers to the ability to perform miracles, while “riches of the mind” refers to the eight parts of the path of realized beings. “What great practitioners collect together” refers to perfectly tranquil concentration and special realization. The “ultimate goal” can be described as achieving the state of an enemy destroyer, or the state of nirvana. This is how the Master Jinaputra explains the various types of giving.

Master Purna explains them as follows:

Nge.jpg

Giving to gain the “jewel of the mind” and the rest of the four refers respectively to (1) that which brings one the riches of faith and the rest; (2) that which is totally inconsistent with the stink of stinginess; (3) that which makes the happiness of balanced meditation grow; and (4) that which brings on the state of nirvana.

These four have also been accepted as relating respectively to the four “results of the way of virtue,” or to (1) the paths of collection and preparation, (2) the path of seeing, (3) the path of habituation, and (4) nirvana. An alternate way is to correlate them with (1) the paths of collection and preparation, (2) the seven impure levels, (3) the three pure levels, and (4) the level of a Buddha. Beyond the above, we can say that there are other acts of giving where, even though the recipient is not a realized being, the resulting merit still cannot be measured in units such as a “hundred thousand times greater” or such. These would involve gifts made to one’s father or mother (recipients who had given one great aid), to the sick (recipients who are in a state of suffering), to a spiritual teacher, or to a bodhisattva in his final life.

Support for this description can be found in the Sutra on Causes and Effect of Right and Wrong, which equates the merit of giving to these objects with the amount of merit you collect from giving something to the Buddha himself:

Moreover, the act of giving performed towards any one of the three different kinds of individuals ripens into a result which never reaches an end at all. These objects are the One Thus Gone, a person’s parents, and the sick.

121

Severity of Deeds according to Six Factors

Conclusion, one who’s acted toward, commission;

Undertaking, thinking, and intention:

The power of the deed itself’s exactly

As little or great as these happen to be.

[IV.473-6]


Here we might touch by the way on what determines how serious a given deed will be. The first factor that can make a deed serious is what we call “performance in conclusion,” which means to continue a particular act well after the original course of action.

The one who’s acted toward in any particular deed—someone who may have lent one great aid in the past—is also a factor in making the deed a serious one. Deeds which are more serious because of the basic type involved in the actual commission of the act would include cases like killing (among the different deeds of the body), lying (among the deeds of speech), and mistaken views (among the deeds of thought). Even among the different types of killing there are those which are more serious—killing an enemy destroyer, for example—because as Close Recollection states,

…it leads one to the lowest hell, “Without Respite.” A less serious type of killing would be to take the life of a person who had reached any of the paths. And the least serious type would be to kill an animal, or a very immoral person.

Deeds made serious by the stage of their preliminary undertaking would be those which involved actually applying oneself physically or verbally. Deeds made serious by the thinking involved would be those where one’s thoughts in carrying out the act were particularly strong. And deeds which turn more serious because of the intention involved would be those where one undertakes an act with particularly strong thoughts of motivation.

We can summarize by saying that the power of the deed itself is exactly as little or great as these six factors of conclusion and the rest happen to be in their own force. One should understand that deeds where all six factors are present in force are extremely serious.


122

Ma-buddha.jpg

Whether Deeds are Collected or Not

A deed is called “collected” from its being

Done intentionally, to its completion,

Without regret, without a counteraction,

With attendants, ripening as well.

[IV.477-80]


Now sutra also mentions a number of concepts including “deeds which are done and also collected” as well as “deeds which are done but which are not collected.” One may ask just what these are.

A deed is called “done and also collected” from its being done with six different conditions, described as follows:

1) The deed must be done intentionally; that is, it cannot have been performed without premeditation, or simply on the spur of the moment.

2) I t must have been done “to its completion”—meaning with all the various elements of a complete deed present.

3) The person who committed the deed must feel no regret later on.

4) There must be no counteraction to work against the force of the deed.

5) The deed must come along with the necessary attendants.

6) The deed must as well be one of those where one is certain to experience the ripening of a result in the future.

Deeds other than the type described are what we call “done but not collected.” From this one can understand what kinds of deeds are meant by the expressions “collected but not done” and “neither done nor collected.” As for the phrase “to its completion,” in some cases a single act of right or wrong leads one to a birth in the states of misery or to a birth in the happier states. In other cases, all ten deeds of all three doors lead a person to the appropriate one of these two births. In either case the deeds have been done to their completion.

The phrase “without a counteraction” refers to deeds done (1) with mistaken ideas, misgivings, or the like; (2) without confession, future restraint, or such. A deed “along with its necessary attendants” means a deed of virtue or nonvirtue along with attendants of further virtue or non-virtue. Admittedly, the Commentary does explains these as “Any deed which you rejoice about having done.” Nonetheless the attendants here are the preliminary undertaking and final conclusion stages of the deed.

See also

Source

jetsongkapa.wordpress.com