ON THE INDIAN ORIGINS OF THE TIBETAN PRACTICE OF
DEPOSITING RELICS AND DHARANISIN STUPAS AND IMAGES*
YAEL BENTOR
THE HEBREWUNIVERSITY
Taking its point of departurein the Fifth Dalai Lama's argumentsin favor of the Indian origins of
Tibetan practices of relic deposition, this study supplies an overview of relevant historical developments in the concept of 'relic' in Indian Buddhism, identifies the scripturalsources to which the Fifth
Dalai Lama alludes, and discusses certain East Asian parallels. It is argued that relic deposition practices provide one specific example of a more general diachronic process of synthesizing various
strands of Indian Buddhism on both the practical and theoretical levels, a process that did not stop
at the Tibetan border.
of just one special dhtrant, such as the 'essence of Interdependent Origination',even the least indication for the
elaborateundertakingknown nowadays does not appear.
The majorityof Indiancast images made of li-mal are actuallymadewithoutinsertingdharanis.Also, in examining
decayingclay images madehere in Tibet in early times, we
have seen no dharants whatsoever inserted in them." So
they claim. This is Mara talking throughtheir mouths. In
the sftras there are numerousteachings on the excelling
merit of making clay images of the Tathagata,however
small, which containrelics (ring-bsrel)-in comparisonto
[themeritaccumulatedby] reverencewith requisitesto the
Buddha together with many millions of communities of
sravakasduringcountlessyears.Therearealso manykinds
of relics-most importantly relics of the dharmakdya,
identified as dharanis. The existence of detailed manuals
on the methodof deposition of dharanis in Indiahas been
establishedby both scripturalauthorityandreasoning(lung
rigs). Even if there is no indication for the deposition of
dhdranisin some Indianbooks, it cannotbe concludedthat
this did not exist in India...
Thereare some li[-ma] images withoutdhdranis.But as
it is explainedthat BuddhaKagyapablessed the substance
of li[-ma], what kind of dhdrani could be superiorto the
blessing of a Buddha?...
It is most unreasonableto arguethatthereis no standard
for depositingdhdranisin some old clay images fromearly
times. If, on accountof occurringin early times something
becomes reliable, then in Tibet the teachings of Bon are
earlier than the Buddhist teachings (nang-pa'i bstan-pa),
the system of Hwa-shangis earlierthanthatof Kamalagila,
TIBETANBUDDHISMLARGELY
CAMETO SEEitself as no
more than a faithful perpetuator of Indian Buddhism.
For example, the standard said to have been invoked
for including
by Bu-ston Rin-chen-grub (1290-1364)
in
his
collection
is
some
scriptures
Kanjur
proof of their
existence in India. The question of deviation from Indian precedents was often raised in Tibetan writings.
The present paper examines one such instance with regard to the practice of depositing relics and dharanis
(gzungs-'bul) in stfupas and images. In Tibet an elaborate
practice of depositing many different types of relics and
dharanis has long existed (Bentor, in preparation). Tibetans have composed various manuals for this practice,
as well as various "indices" (dkar-chag) listing the actual contents of important stupas and images (Martin,
forthcoming). One of these manuals, written by the Fifth
Dalai Lama, contains the following rebuttal, directed toward certain persons who claimed that this 'elaborate'
practice had no Indian origin.
Some who are proudof their partialtalent, who are intellectually [too] blindto see [whatis in] the sitra[s], Sastra[s],
and commentarieswithout discrimination,who are taken
by the god of desire,exclaim the [following] evil wordsout
of theirmisconceptions."Tibetanlamas insertdhdranisin
images, stipas and so forthwhich they construct;yet in India there was no [such practice].As for the origin of this,
in some Indianbooks, apartfrom describingthe insertion
* I would like to express my gratitude to Prof. Gregory
Schopen, who both initiated and guided my research on this
topic while I was a graduate student. Warm thanks also to
Daniel Boucher for his kind comments on a previous draft of
this paper.
1An especially appreciated alloy for images (see Tucci
1959; Dagyab 1977: 50-57).
248
BENTOR:
Indian Origins of the Tibetan Practice of Depositing Relics
and the views of the Jo-nang-paare earlier than those of
the GreatVictoriousTsong-kha-pa.When this is the case,
the necessity of saying thatthe earlierarecorrect,while the
later are not, will cause inexhaustibleharm.2
In order to clarify these arguments, we need to survey the
prior development of the concept of relics in India.
A. PHYSICAL RELICS
It is now well recognized that a wide range of views
existed in India with regard to the cult of relics. While
one influential doctrine asserted that the Buddha had
passed into a state of nirvana, which leaves nothing be-
2 Yon-tan
phyogs-re tsam-gyis dregs-shing/ mdo bstan-bcos
dgongs-'grel ris-su ma-chad-pa-la Ita-ba'i blo mig mam-par
Idongs-pa 'dod-pa'i lhas rjes-su bzung-ba la-la-dag-gis skugzugs dang mchod-rten sogs bzhengs-pa-la gzungs-gzhug 'bulba 'di-dag bod-kyi bla-ma-rnams-kyis byas-kyi/ rgya-gar-na
med-do snyam-pa'i log-rtog-gi ngan smras-sgrog-cing/ de'i
khungs-su/ rgya-gzhung 'ga'-zhig-na rten-'brel snying-po Itabu'i gzungs-dmigs-bsal re-re tsam 'jug zer-ba las/ deng-sang
yongs-su grag-pa 'di-'dra byed-pa'i 'phros zur-tsam-yang mi
snang-ba dang/'phags-yul-gyi sku li-ma-mams gar-lugs shasche-bas gzungs-gzhug med-pa mngon-sum-gyisgrub-cing/ bod'dir sngon-dus bzhengs-pa'i Ider-bzo zhig-pa mams-la brtags
tshe-yang gzungs-gzhugji-bzhin mi 'dug-pa mthong-bas-so zhes
zer mod/ de-dag ni bdud-kyiskha rnam-parphye-ba'i gtam-ste/
mdo-las/ sangs-rgyas nyan-thos-kyidge-'dun bye-ba phrag duma dang bcas-pa-la lo grangs dpag-tu med-par yo-byad-kyis
bsnyen-bkur byas-pa las/ de-bzhin-gshegs-pa'i sku-gzugs
mtshon gang-pa ring-bsrel-gyi snying-po-can-zhig 'jim-pa-las
bsgrubs-pa bsod-nams lhag-pa sogs mang-dugsungs-pas/ ringbsrel-la ram-grangs mang-yang/ gtso-bor chos-sku'i ringbsrel ni gzungs-la ngos-'dzin-pa'i-phyir/ gzungs-'bul tshul-gyi
lag-len zhib-mo rgya-gar du yod-pa lung-rigs gnyis-kas 'grubcing/ rgya-gzhung 'ga'-zhig-tu gzungs 'bul-ba'i gsal-cha medpa tsam-gyis/ rgya-gar-du med-pa mi 'grub-ste/... li'i rgyurnams-la sangs-rgyas 'od-srungs-kyis byin-rlabs mdzad-par
bshad-pas/ li'i sku 'ga'-zhig-la gzungs-gzhug med-kyangsangsrgyas-kyis byin-gyis brlabs-pa-las lhag-pa'i gzungs ci-zhig
dgos/... sngon-gyi lder-bzo rying-pa 'ga'-zhig-la gzungsgzhug tshad-ldan mi 'dug-go zhes zer-ba ni shin-tu mi rigs-te/
snga-rabs-kyi dus-su byung-ba rgyu-mtshan-dubyas-te khungs
btsun-par 'gyur-na/ bod-du nang-pa'i bstan-pa-las bon-po'i
bstan-pa snga-zhing/ka-ma-la-shi-la'i ring-lugs-las hva-shanggi grub-mtha' snga-ba dang/ rgyal-ba tsong-kha-pa chen-po'i
Ita-ba'i bzheng-pa-las jo-mo-nang-pa'i Ita-ba-dag snga-ba'i
phyir-na/ snga-ma-mams-dag-gi phyi-ma-mams mi dag-go
zhes smra dgos-par 'gyur-pa sogs gnod-byed mi zad-pa thog-tu
'bab-bo (pp. 400.6-403.4). (I would like to thankGeshe Thubten
Tandharfor his help with this difficult passage.)
249
hind, there is plentiful evidence to show that the Buddha was conceived as present in his relics. In addition,
between these two extremes, a spectrum of solutions to
the problematic status of the Buddha in the present
world of samsara was offered.3 Especially noteworthy
are the implications of the various theories on the multiple bodies (kdya) of the Buddha,4 distinguishing his
physical body, which gave rise to the bodily relics,
from his body of dharmas (dharmakaya),5 and the other
bodies of the threefold, fourfold and fivefold classifications. Though the body of dharmas does not leave any
relics behind, as a phenomenon a relic is still possible.
Just like the physical body, bodily relics are regarded
as skillful means-benefiting
sentient beings (see Such. 2,6 The Buddhabalacdhanavarnaprabhasottama,
Sutra7). Hence, tensions
pratiharya-vikurvdna-nirdesa
with regard to the location of the true Buddha could be
partly reconciled by means of theories on the multiple
bodies of the Buddha.
Archaeological evidence points to the prominence of
the relic cult in the early centuries of Buddhist history.
A stupa enshrining the relics of the Buddha or other
Buddhist personages is found at the center of a significant number of Buddhist monasteries, serving as the
main focus of worship.8 Foremost among the relics in
the early Buddhist period were the physical remains
(sartra, dhatu) of Sakyamuni Buddha. The locus classicus for accounts of the relics of the Buddha is the
Mahaparinirvdna Sutra, which relates how these relics
were divided and enshrined in eight stupas.9 The Buddhist scriptures contain further evidence for the practice
of erecting stupas and images containing relics. Most
often, such evidence is in the form of praises to the
practice and of the merit deriving from its performance.
One example is a passage found almost verbatim in
three different scriptures: the Adbhutadharmaparyaya
(Bentor 1988), the Kutagara Sutra (Toh. 332), and the
Maharana Sutra (Toh. 208).
Indeed, Ananda, the continent of Jarnbfdvipa is seven
thousandyojanas in length and in breadth. In the north
it is broad; in the south it has the shape of a cart. If it
were made of the seven precious substances and some
3 See Falk 1977; Eckel 1985, 1992; Schopen 1987, 1988;
Trainor 1990; Collins 1992: 235; etc.
4
Nagao 1973; Reynolds 1977; Williams 1989: 167-84;
Eckel 1992: 97-109; Harrison 1992, etc.
5 A translation
recently suggested by Harrison (1992).
6 Emmerick 1970: 7-8; see also Snellgrove 1987: 37.
7 Schopen 1978: 332 and 1987: 223, n. 58. With regard to
images, see Lancaster 1974.
8 See Schopen 1991 and references there.
9 Dfgha Nikdya,II.166-67, translatedin Walshe 1987: 276-77.
250
Journal of the American Oriental Society 115.2 (1995)
believingson or daughterof goodfamilywereto offerit
to the Stream-Enterers,
Once-Returners,
Non-Returners,
orto thecommunityof monks
Arhats,Pratyekabuddhas,
of thefourdirections;orif someonewereto establishfor
the Tathfgata,the Arhat,the Fully EnlightenedOne,
who attainedcompletenirvana,a stfpa the size of an
dmalakafruitmadefroma lumpof clay, and were to
stickintoit a stfpa-polethesize of a needlewithanumbrellathe size of a juniperleaf, wereto makean image
the size of a grainof barley,andwereto put into it [or
establish]10a relic the size of a mustardseed, I say,
Ananda,the meritof the latteris muchgreaterthanthe
former.11
it" (Rahula 1956: 126). It may be recalled that the Fifth
Dalai Lama specifically discusses the deposition of relics
and dharanis in images. A reference to an image containing a relic is found already in the canonical text, the
Bhiksunt-vibhaiga (Schopen 1993: 218, and n. 32). Archaeology, as well, provides evidence of the deposition
of relics in images. For example, the base of an eight-foottall Buddha image in Nagfirjunakonda(site no. 6) contained a reliquarysimilar to those found in stupas.
Betweenthe legs, 1'2"long and53/4" broad,is a socket
drilledon the upperpartof the padmdsanawhichwas
hiddenfromview by the perfectionof its close-fitting
stonestopper(pl. XIV-A). Onremovingthestonepiece
of stopper,thehole was foundto be 1/2"in diameterand
We will encounter other similar types of arguments.
When the Fifth Dalai Lama mentions numerous teachings found in the sutras, in which the making of clay images [or stupas], even in miniature size, but containing
relics, is taught to be of superiormerit to countless offerings made to sravakas [and so forth], he is probably re-
deep, and in it was found a gold tube 3/4" high and
in diameter (p. XIV-B). This tube contained 95
pearls, one of them measuring 1/8 in diameter and the
13/4"
1/3"
rest smallerthanmustardseeds, and bone(?)ash that
hadslippedintothecavityas thebottomof thetubehad
beenopened.Themouthof thetubewasclosedby hand
pressure.The ash has not beenexaminedbutit maybe
ferring to scriptures such as the Adbhutadharnnaparyiya,
Kutaigra or Maharana sutras.12
During the centuries, in its outer form, the stipa came
to symbolize the teachings, the enlightenment,the pathto
enlightenment, the qualities of the Enlightened One, the
Buddha,andreality as it is, thatis to say the dharmabody.
Inside were deposited relics of the physical manifestation
of the Buddha and other Buddhist personages. Hence,
both physical and abstract aspects of the Buddha are
found in the stupa.13
The cult of images was another solution to the problem of the presence or the representationof the Buddha
in the samsaric world (Collins 1992: 235-36). Furthermore, the various solutions to the presence or representation of the Buddha were conjoined. Relics were
deposited not only in stfpas but also in images. In fact,
according to some of the Pali commentaries, "An image
was considered importantonly if relics were enshrinedin
10 MSB of the
Sanskrit,in all theparallelsections,as well as
the Tibetanversionsof all three scriptureshave the reading
'put into' (praksipet, bcug), while MSA of the Sanskrit has
'establisha relic'(dhatumpratisthtpayet),whichmayreflecta
formof the relic cult not yet associatedwith stupasor images
(see Bentor1988:26-27).
ll Bentor1988:41. This is a translationfromthe Adbhutadharmaparyaya.
12 Also the
Puspakuta-Dhdranf(Toh. 516 and 886) contains
similarargumentsin stressingthe superiorityof offeringsto a
containingrelicsas smallas a mustardseed.
stfpaof a Tathagata
13 For a comprehensive
study of the stfpa, see Kottkamp
1992;specificallyon the symbolismof the stfpa, see, for example,Harvey1990.
of bone.14
B. RELICS OF THE DHARMA
The Buddhist teachings are another solution to the
problem of the Buddha'spresence-he who has gone to
nirvana-in the samsaric world. The Buddha was conceived to be present or representednot only in his relics
and images, but also in his teachings, the dharma.15Frequently, the latter was represented as superior. The
teachings were regardedas the true body of the Buddha,
superior to his physical remains. The tensions between
these two views were accommodated, to some extent,
again, in the theory of the multiple bodies of the Buddha. One of the preoccupations of the Mahayana sutras
is with "an equation of the presence of the dharmaparyaya with the presence of the Buddha" (Schopen
1975: 175). Such a view is found in "texts like the Saddharmapundarikaand Suvarnaprabhasottama,texts in
which 'the text or book as a source of sacred power' is a
fundamentalpreoccupation. This preoccupation, though
little studied, is a clear characteristic of much of early
and middle Mahayana sutra literature"(Schopen 1982:
105). Our concern here will be limited to the dharmain
its written form. The worship of the book, as containing
the presence or representationof the Buddha, found an
14
Ramachandran1953: 14. I would like to thank G. Schopen
for this reference.
15
Schopen 1975; Mitomo 1984; Williams 1989: 167-84;
Boucher1991;Harrison1992,etc.
BENTOR: Indian Origins of the Tibetan Practice of Depositing
expression, among others, in the deposition of Buddhist
scriptures in stupas. Such a practice is mentioned, for
example, in the Pratyutpanna Sutra.
Here,in the presentage, theyreceivemy teaching;
Theywill distributeandmakeofferingsto theserelics;
Calmlyandcarefullythey will acceptandstudywhatthe
Buddhahas taught,
Theywill all reciteit andhavetheircommission.
Theywill placeit in stfpas andin the mountains,... 16
These verses are found in the early translations of the
Sutra into Chinese, dating from at least the early third
century C.E.17Excavations of stufpasrevealed Buddhist
Sanskrit texts as well. In fact, some of the most important discoveries of such manuscriptsin the modern age,
including those found in Gilgit and Central Asia dated
to the 6th-7th centuries, may have been the result of
such a practice.18
The cult of the book "had to contend at every step
with the historical priority and the dominance of the
stapa/relic cult of early Buddhism in the milieu in
which it was attempting to establish itself" (Schopen
1975: 168). Therefore, even though the cult of the book
was originally antipathetic to the stupa cult, it was
partly modelled on the relic cult. Special attention was
already given in scholarly works to the passages in the
Astasahasrikd-Prajnidpdaramita
Sutra (chapters 3 and
4), which advocate the worship of that same Sutra as superior to the worship of the Buddha's relics in stupas.19
This is based on the argument that it is the teachings
rather than the physical body of the Buddha that have
enabled him to attain enlightenment. The style of argu16
Chapter13, verses 8-9, translationby Harrison,forthcoming.Note thatherealso the Buddha'steachingsareexplicitly calledrelics.
17 Paul Harrison,personalcommunication,
Sept. 17, 1992.
verAccordingto him,theseversesarefoundin "Lokaksema's
sion,"i.e., T. 418 at 91lb27-28. However,thispartof thetext,
withits versetranslations
of thegdthas,is partof RedactionB,
andmay datefromthe laterrevision(probablyearly3rdcenturyC.E.)of the originaltranslationby Lokaksema.
18It is also possiblethatBuddhistscripturesweredeposited
in stfpas in a practiceanalogousto the Jewishgeniza(suchas
the famousone in Alexandria),thatis to say, damagedbooks
were 'buried'in a stfpa. Againstthis possibility,we may say
thatsourcessuchas thePratyutpanna
Sftra andotherscitedin
Schopen1975,Mitomo1984,andHarrison1992notonly conceive the writtenscripturesas relics, but also suggestplacing
themin stipas.
19Schopen1975;Lancaster1981;Mitomo1984;Kajiyama
1985;Snellgrove1987;Williams1989: 164-84; Eckel 1992:
97-99; Harrison1992,etc.
251
Relics
ment in the passages in question consists of a comparison of one written copy of the Sutra to the entire world
filled with the relics of the Tathagata. In correlation to
the argument found in the Adbhutadharmaparyaya
cited
above, the relics are found here on the other side of the
scale. During the centuries, however, "the cult of relics
eventually coalesced with the cult of the book" (Harrison 1992: 76).
The great majority of Indian stuipasdid not contain
entire scriptures, but only parts of them. Hsiian Tsang
observed the practice of placing written fragments of
the scriptures, called dharmasarfra, in small stfpas,
which were in turn collected in a large stipa (Hsiian
Tsang, II:146-47). The most common piece of scripture
deposited in strupaswas the verse of Interdependent
Origination, considered to be the epitome of the Buddhist teachings.20Numerous clay seals stamped with the
verse of InterdependentOrigination were found within
stupas, mostly from the second half of the first millennium C.E. (Taddei 1970). As Boucher (1991: 15) has
shown, this verse "became a manifestation of the Buddha's real presence at cultic centers ...
in the same way
as relics were thought to infuse the living presence of
the Buddha in stupas."
A scriptural authority for the practice of depositing
the verse of Interdependent Origination in stupas is
found in the Pratityasamutpada Sutra (Toh. 212, 520
and 980):
"If a devotedson or daughterof good family were to
make on an unestablishedplace (apratisthitedese or
pradese)a stfpa the size of an dmalakafruit-with a
yasti the size of a needleandan umbrellathe size of a
bakulaflower-and were to put in it the verse of the
Dharma-relic
of Pratityasamutpada,
he [or she] would
generate brahmicmerit (brahmapunyamprasavet)." Af-
ter theirdeath,they will be bornin Brahmaworlds.21
The description of a miniature stupa here is very
similar to that of the Adbhutadharmaparyaya,
yet the
physical relic is replaced with the dharma relic of the
verse of InterdependentOrigination. From the style of
argument, it is clear that also here, as in the Prajiidparamitd Sutra mentioned above, well-established
practices were used as the basis for comparison. The
20 Yedharmd
hetuprabhavahetum tesdm tathagato hy avadat
tesdm ca yo nirodha evam vadi mahdtramanah, "Those dhar-
maswhicharisefroma cause,the Tathagata
has declaredtheir
cause.And thatwhichis the cessationof them,thusthe great
renuncianthas taught"(tr.Boucher1991:11).
21 Translated
by SalomonandSchopen1984: 117. The last
sentencewas addedby the author.
252
Journal of the American Oriental Society 115.2 (1995)
basic assumption is that, as the physical relics are the
essence of the Buddha, so the verse of Interdependent
Origination is the essence of the teachings. But the
Buddha is present in his teachings rather than in his
physical remains. Hence, this verse could be said to
contain both the teachings and the Buddha.
When the Fifth Dalai Lama mentions that Indian
books instruct one to deposit only one dharani, such as
the "essence of InterdependentOrigination," he probably had in mind the Pratityasamutpada Sutra.22This
sutra is mentioned by name in other ritual manuals as
the scriptural authority for the practice of depositing
dhdranis and relics (Padma-'phrin-las, p. 306; Kongsprul, p. 146, etc.).
So far, the deposition of the verse of Interdependent
Origination was presented as an alternative to the deposition of physical relics in stupas. The Sutra on the
Merit of Building a Stupa, preserved in Chinese only
(Boucher 1991), is similar to the Pratityasamutpdda
Sutra. yet it provides the possibility of depositing
within a miniature stipa both the physical relics of the
Buddha and the dharma in the form of the verse of
Interdependent Origination. Similarly, I Tsing, who
witnessed the practice of making stupas in India in
the seventh century, reports on the placing of both
physical relics and the verse of InterdependentOrigination within the stupas (1896: 150-51). A much earlier
Kharosti inscription on a relic casket in a shape of a
stipa found in the KurramValley in Pakistan not only
includes the limbs of the Pratityasamutpada, it also
contains record of the deposition of a relic of Sakyamuni.23In these cases, two practices which correspond
to differing views on the true location of the Buddha
have been synthesized into a single practice. According
to I Tsing, physical relics and the verse of Interdependent Origination were deposited not only in stupas, but
in images as well. Other Indian examples (Boucher
1991: 14-15) show that the relic cult in stupas was
translated to images. The content of Tibetan images
differs only slightly from the content of stupas.
C. DHARANIS AS RELICS24
The principle that a verse encapsulates the essence of
the Buddhist teachings and may be deposited in stipas
and images was extended around the middle of the first
millennium C.E., with the emergence of a new genre of
22ForotherIndianworks,see below.
23 Mitra
24 On
1981-3, 2:412;see also Boucher1991:4.
dhdranis,in general,see Winternitz(1939, 11:380-
87); Lalou (1957); Lamotte (1976: 1854-77); de Jong [Matsunaga] 1984: 95-96; etc.
Buddhist Mahayana literature,called the dhdrani sitra.
Several of these sutras advocate the practice of depositing their entire text, or at least the dharani or other
mantras taught in them, inside stupas.25The reason for
that, according to the Guhyadhatu,26
Wherever this text (chos-kyi ram-grangs, dharmaparydya) resides, a hundred thousand, ten million, as
many as thereare sesame seeds, Tathagatasreside; bodily
relics (sku gdung ring-bsrel) of inexplicable numbers27
of Tathagatasreside; the eighty-four thousand heaps of
dharma28reside.29
Here, as the earlier Mahayana scriptures, this dharani
sftra equates its presence with the presence of the Buddha. And like the developments surveyed above, the
presence of this text is considered tantamount to the
presence of the bodily relics of the Tathagata. Moreover, like the verse of InterdependentOrigination, this
dharani
sftra is regarded as the equivalent
of the
dharmain its entirety. In other words, this dharani sitra
is synonymous with the various concepts of relics we
have observed so far. The word dharant, which seems
originally to have referred to the memorization of the
teachings of the Buddha, has acquired additional meanings (Lamotte 1976: 1863-64).
Here, the text and, as
we shall see below, also its various mantras,are equivalent to the Buddha, his relics and the teachings. Indeed,
the Guhyadhatu instructs one to place this text within a
stupa or image.
The Blessed One said: Vajrapani, if someone were to
write this text (chos-kyi rnam-grangs) and place it inside a stfpa, [that stupa] would become a stfpa of the
25 Some of these dhtrani sitras were studied
by Schopen
(1982, 1985) and Scherrer-Schaub(forthcoming).
26 The full name of this sutra is
Sarvatathdgatddhisthdnahrdaya-guhya-dhdtu-karanda-mudrd-ndma-dhdrani-mahdydnasutra(Toh. 507, 883; P. 141, 508; Tog Palace, no. 469, vol. 102,
pp. 1-19).
27 This translation of khar-yas-khar-yas was suggested to
me by Geshe Thubten Tandhar.
28 A reference to the entire corpus of the teachings of the
Buddha.
29 Chos-kyi rnam-grangs 'di gang-na gnas-pa der/ de-bzhingshegs-pa 'bum-phrag bye-ba til-gyi gang-bu snyed gnasshing/ de-bzhin-gshegs-pa khar-yas khar-yas zhes bya-ba
snyed-kyi sku-gdung ring-bsrel-rnams gnas-so chos-kyi
phung-po brgyad-khribzhi-stong gnas-so [the word chos-kyi is
mistakenly repeated] (Tog Palace, vol. 102, p. 8.5-7). Paraphrased in Schopen 1982: 103, where the entire sitra is
summarized.
BENTOR:
Indian Origins of the Tibetan Practice of Depositing Relics
relics (ring-bsrel) of the vajra essence of all Tathagatas.
It would become a stfpa blessed by the secret essence
of the dhdrani of all Tathfgatas. It would become a
stipa of ninety-nine times as many as there are sesame
seeds Tathagatas.It would be blessed as the stfpa of the
usnfsa and eye of all Tathagatas.If someone were to insert it into any image or stfpa of the Buddha, [that] image of the Tathagatawould be blessed as if it were made
of the seven precious substances.30
Note that, here, images serve as receptacles for these
relics along with stupas.
Additional dhdrani sfitras teach that the presence of
their mantras within a stupa is equal to the presence of
the actual Buddhas and their physical relics. The Vimalosni.a31 says:
If someone were to make one hundredand eight stupas,
write this hrdaya of the vidyd mantra,32insert it in the
stfpa[s], and place [them] on top of a mandala, it would
be as if they had placed inside each stfpa the bodily remains (sku-gdung) and relics (ring-bsrel) of Tathagatas
as many as there are grains of sand in ninety-nine hundred thousand million billions of Ganges Rivers. It
would also become the essence of relics (ring-bsrel-gyi
snying-po).33
30
Bcom-ldan-'das-kyis bka'-stsal-pa/ lag-na-rdo-rje gangzhig chos-kyi rnam-grangs 'di bris-te mchod-rten-gyi nangdu bzhag-pa de/ de-bzhin-gshegs-pa thams-cad-kyi rdo-rje'i
snying-po'i ring-bsrel-gyi mchod-rten-du 'gyur-ro/ de-bzhingshegs-pa thams-cad-kyi gzungs-kyi snying-po gsang-bas
byin-gyis brlabs-pa'i mchod-rten-du 'gyur-ro/ de-bzhingshegs-pa til-gyi gang-bu snyed dgu-bcu rtsa dgu'i mchodrten-du 'gyur-ro/ de-bzhin-gsheg-pa thams-cad-kyi gtsug-tor
dang spyan-gyi mchod-rten-du byin-gyis brlabs-par 'gyur-ro/
gang-zhig sangs-rgyas-kyi gzugs-brnyan-nam/ mchod-rten
thams-cad-kyi nang-du 'jog-par byed-na/ de-bzhin-gshegs-pa'i
gzugs-brnyan rin-po-che sna-bdun-gyi rang-bzhin-du byingyis brlabs-par 'gyur-ro (Tog Palace, no. 469, vol. 102,
pp. 12.7-13.4). This passage was partially translated in
Schopen 1982: 104.
31 The complete name of this sftra is Samanta-mukhapravesa-rasmi-vimalosnfsa-prabhasa-sarva-tathdgata-hrdayasamaya-vilokita-ndma-dharani (Toh. 599, 983; P. 206, 608;
Tog Palace 557, vol. 104, pp. 517-43.
32 For the different
categories of mantras such as hrdaya,
upahrdaya, vidyd, mantra, etc., see Mkhas-grub-rje 1968:
117. Various such mantras are taught in Vimalosnisa.
33 Mchod-rten brgya-rtsa-brgyad btab-pa-la rig-sngags-kyi
snying-po 'di bris-te mchod-rten-gyi nang-du bcug-nas dkyil'khor-gyi steng-du bzhag-na/ gang-gd'i klung bye-ba khragkhrig 'bum-phrag dgu-bcu rtsa-dgu'i bye-ma snyed-kyi de-
253
Similarly, the Rasmivimala says,34
If any noble son were to write this secret mantra(gsang
sngags) diligently ninety-nine times, were to place it on
the four sides of the stupa-pole (srog-shing, yasti) and
were to write, as well, the very book of this ritual and
place it within the stfpa-pole; if he were to perform
such a ritual it would be as if he has established a stfpapole for ninety-nine thousand st0pas. Furthermore, it
would be as if he has established ninety-nine thousand
stipas containing relics.35
The last example
garbha,36
we will give here is the Bodhi-
Vajrapani,any son or daughterof good family or monk
or nun or lay [man or] woman .. ., who makes a good
stipa at a junction of four roads,37or in front of a mountain, or at a bank [of a body of water], or at an entrance
to a town, or at a major road, and inserts into that stupa
the phyag-rgya38 of this dhtrani and also puts up a
yasti, the stOpaof that son or daughterof a good family
will be called a stupa of bodily relics of the Tathagata ... will be called a stfpa of the essence of the Buddha, will be called a stfpa of the essence of the
Tathagata.39
bzhin-gshegs-pa-rnams-kyisku-gdung dang ring-bsrel mchodrten re-re'i nang-du bcug-par 'gyur-ro/ ring-bsrel-gyi snyingpor yang 'gyur-ro (Tog Palace, vol. 104, pp. 529.7-530.2; see
also p. 541.5-6 for a similar statement).
34 The full name is
Rasmi-vimala-viSuddha-prabhd-ndmadhdrani (Toh. 510, 982; P. 218; Tog Palace 559, vol. 104,
pp. 563-93).
35
Rigs-kyi bu ci-nas-kyang gsang-sngags 'di nan-tan-du
dgu-bcu rtsa dgur yi-ger bris-te/ mchod-rten-gyi srog-shing-gi
ngos-bzhir gzhug-go/ de'ang cho-ga'i gzhung-'di nyid-kyang
bris-te srog-shing-gi nang-du gzhug-go/ cho-ga de-ltar byasna mchod-rten dgu-khri dgu-stong-gi srog-shing btsugs-pa
dang-'dra'o/ de'i gong-du'ang mchod-rten ring-bsrel-can dgukhri dgu-stong bzhengs-pa dang 'dra'o (Tog Palace, vol. 104,
p. 575.1-3).
36 Bodhi-manddlanikra-ndma-dhdrani-upacara, included
only in the Phug-brag Kanjur (microfiche, Institute for the
Advanced Studies of World Religions, cf. Jampa Samten 1992:
120). Another version was found in Dunhuang,P.T. 555 (Scherrer Schaub, forthcoming).
37 Reading bzhi for gzhi.
38 A type of mantra.
39 Lag-na-rdo-rje rigs-kyi bu-'am/ rigs-kyi bu-mo-'am/ dgeslong-ngam/ dge-slong-ma-'am/ dge-bsnyen-ma gang-zhiggis ./.
lam-gyi gzhi mdo-'am/ ri-drung-ngam/ chu-'grammam/ grong-khyer-gyi sgo-'am/ lam-po-cher mchod-rten legs-
254
Journal of the American Oriental Society 115.2 (1995)
The prescriptions of these dharani suitraswere actually put into practice. Such dharanis were found deposited in stupas in the Indian subcontinent, Sri Lanka,
Tibet, China, Korea and Japan.40It should be noted that
such dharanis were not found just within stuipas, but
also inside images.
The Vimalosnlsa
Dharant exca-
vated at Paharpur,for example, was written on a small
clay tablet which was encased in a small terracottaimage of the Buddha. This image was, in turn, placed
within a stfpa.41 In Ratnagiri the Vimalosnisa Dhdirant
is found on the back of an image of the Bodhisattva
Lokesvara (Mitra 1981-83, 1: 104).
When the Fifth Dalai Lama mentioned Indian books
that speak of the insertion of one special dhdranl in images, he most likely had in mind the dhdrant sutras
mentioned above. The Tibetan tradition classifies four
of these dharanis related to stupas, along with the verse
of InterdependentOrigination, in a category called the
Five Great Dharanils(gzungs chen sde Inga). These five
are: 1. Gtsug-tor rnam-rgyal (Usnisavijaya), 2. Gtsugtor dri-med (Vimalosnfsa), 3. Gsang-ba ring-bsrel
(Guhyadhatu), 4. Byang-chub rgyan 'bum (Bodhi[gar5. Rten-'brel snying-po (Pratftbha]alahkdralaksa),
yasamutpdda).42 These are indeed the dharanis found
said: "Four [types] of relics were taught. Among them,
the relics of the dharmakdya,the dharani mantras,were
taught as superior."44At the time these Tibetans wrote,
a complete synthesis of the various depositions within
stfpas and images had already taken place. It is the last
phase in the development surveyed here that is dominant in these Tibetan writings. Another indication of
this is the name for the practice of depositing the sacred
objects within stupas and images, called in Tibetan
gzungs-'bul (offering dhdranis) or gzungs-gzhug (inserting dharanizs); gzungs (dharanls) being the general
name for all the deposits, including physical relics,
dhtranis, books and so forth.
To conclude, the Buddha was conceived to be present
or represented in his physical relics, images and teachings. In our case the teachings are either entire books
containing the teachings, or the verse of Interdependent
Origination, or dharanis considered also to be the essence of the Buddha, his relics and his teachings.45
D. INDIAN ORIGINS
The final point discussed by the Fifth Dalai Lama is
whether detailed manuals for the practice of depositing
dhdranfs and relics exist in India. He does not point out
any such existing manuals. He declares only that their
"existence in India has been established by both scriptural authority and reasoning." The scriptural authorities cited by Tibetan authors for such manuals are
mostly the sutras encountered above, the Adbhutadhar-
most frequently in stupas and on stone tablets throughout the Buddhist world.
Also these dhdrani sutras advocate their own cult in
preference to the well-known and established practices
associated with physical relics and dharmarelics. When
the Fifth Dalai Lama says, "there are also many kinds
of relics-most importantly relics of the dharmakdya
identified as dharantls,"he probably relies on the standpoint of these dharani sfitras.This position is shared by
other Tibetan writers, who find support in the dharani
sutras. Citing the Guhyadhatu,43the First Lcang-skya
pcda sutras, as well as the various dharani sitras. In
addition, also the Subahupariprccha,one of the four basic kriya tantrasis mentioned. While this tantradoes not
par byas-te/ mchod-rten de'i dbus-su gzungs 'di'i phyag-rgyayang 'jug-te srog-shing-yang 'dzugs-par byed-na/ rigs-kyi bu'am/ rigs-kyi bu-mo de'i mchod-rten ni/... de-bzhin-gshegspa'i ring-bsrel-gyi sku-gdung dang bcas-pa'i mchod-rten ces
bya/sangs-rgyas-kyi snying-po'i mchod-rtences bya/de-bzhingshegs-pa'i snying-po'i mchod-rten ces bya'o (Phug-brag Kanjur Rgyud Tsha, vol. 116, fols. 65b6-66a3).
40 Tucci, 1932/1988: 74; Liebenthal 1947: 23-24, 37;
Schopen 1982 and 1985; von Hiniber 1987-88; Yuyama 1989.
41 Chandra and Dikshit 1936: 124-25 and plates LIX-LX
there; see also Dikshit 1938: 84.
42 See Grags-pa-rgyal-mtshan (p. 240.4), The fifth Dalai
Lama (p. 409.6), Padma-'phrin-las (p. 318), 'Jam-dbyangsbzhad-pa (vol. II, p. 487.6), Kong-sprul (p. 103), Krang-dbyisun (p. 2507).
43 The passage translated above.
44 Lta-bu'i rings [sic]-bsrel bzhi gsungs-shing/ de'i nang-nas
chos-sku'i rings (sic)-bsrel/ gzungs-sngags mchog-du gsungsde/ (P. 6301, p. 89.4.4-5). A similar statement is made by the
First Panchen Lama, p. 801. For the four types of relics, see
Grags-pa-rgyal-mtshanbelow.
45 Note that Scherrer-Schaub (forthhcoming) comes to a
different conclusion: "If the dhtrani very often have an apotropaic value or function, in our case the 'apotropy', with its
etymology of 'deviating or deflecting' (greek apotrepein) intervenes between cause and effect (hetuphalasambandha),in other
words it acts at the core of the causation theory. But the main
feature of the ritual itself is to be a 'cleansing ritual', that is to
say it purifies from evil and thereby it inflects future existences
towardpureor happy abodes." No doubt, the texts provide many
justifications for this conclusion, as well.
maparyaya, Kutdgara, Mahdrana, and Pratftyasamut-
BENTOR:
Indian Origins of the Tibetan Practice of Depositing Relics
elaborate on the practice,46 it does mention images containing relics, along with similar stupas. One of the few
Indian works treating this subject is the relatively late
Vajravalf by Abhayakaragupta (1064?-1 125?).47
Whenever you wish to make a special homage to relics
(sku-gdung) of the Tathfgata, you should at the time of
making [an image or stfpa] leave the head or back of an
image or the center of a stfpa hollow. When completed,
you should write on birch bark with saffron or bezoar:
namo bhagavate sdtkyamunaye tathagatcya arhate
samyak-sambuddhtya om mune mune mahdmuneye
[read: mahamunaye] svdahi;ye dharmd hetu prabhavd
hetun tesdn tathdgato hy avadat tesdii ca yo nirodha
evam vddi mahdsramanah; and also special dhdranis.
Wrap them around the relic which has been purified
through the bathing ritual. While reciting: om mantradhdtu-garbhdya svdhd (om to the one which has as its
essence [womb], mantras and relics svdah), place
them in the hollow space. Then recite om vajra-dhatugarbhaya svdhd (om to the one which has as its essence
[womb] the vajra relic svdhd) and block the door to the
hollow space with vajra plaster. Perform the consecration (rab-gnas) as above.48
46 The first
chapter of the tantra has the following: "For the
sake of purifying sins, at a pure and isolated place, constantly
make clay or sand stfpas of the Sugata containing the essence
of Interdependent Origination. Offer praises, garlands, perfumes and butter lamps to images or stipas containing relics
(ring-bsrel). With the highest devotion make offerings of parasols, victory banners, flags and music." gtsang-zhing dben-pa
sa-yi phyogs-su ni/ 'jim-pa'am ni bye-ma-las byas-pa'i/ bdegshegs mchod-rten rten-'brel snying-po-can/ sdig-pa sbyangba'i phyir ni rtag-tu gdab/ ring-bsrel-can-gyi sku-gzugs
mchod-rten-la/ bstod-cing phreng-ba dri dang mar-me dbul/
gdugs dang rgyal-mtshan ba-dan rol-mo dang/ mchog-tu dadpa-yis ni mchod-par bya Toh. 805, Derge Kanjur, vol. 96,
p. 238).
47 For Abhayfkaraguptasee, Biihnemann 1992. Another Indian source mentioned by Kong-sprul (p. 102) was written by
Vanaratna(1384-1468).
48 Gang-gi-tshe de-bzhin-gshegs-pa'i sku-gdung-la bkur-sti'i
khyad-par bya-bar 'dod-na/ de'i tshe sgrub-pa'i dus-nyid-du
sku-gzugs-kyi dbu-'am rgyab dang mchod-rten-gyi dbus stongpar bya'o/ grub-pa-na gro-gar gur-gum dang gi-wang-dag-gis/
namo bhagavate sdkyamunaye tathagatdya arhate samyaksambuddhdyaom mune mune mahdmuneyesv~dh2.Ye dharma
hetuprabhavd hetun tesan tathdgato hy avadat tesdni ca yo
nirodha evam vtdt mahdsramanah zhes-pa dang/ gzungs-kyi
khyad-paryang bris-nas/ de-khrus-byas-pa'igdung-la dkris-te
om mantra-dhdtu-garbhayasvdhd/ zhes brjod-cing stong-bar
255
The relics and dhdranis deposited here are certainly
not as numerous as in later Tibetan rituals. They specifically consist only of the relics of the Buddha and the
dharani of Buddha Sakyamuni, together with the verse
of the "essence of Interdependent Origination." Again,
their deposition applies equally to both stfpas and images. The process of wrapping the dharanis around the
physical relics emphasizes their equal status. This is
expressed, as well, by the mantra recited during their
insertion into the stupa or image. The stupa or image
has for its essence both mantras and physical relics
(mantra-dhatu-garbha).
Attention should be drawn to the fact that various relics, books and dharants were found also within Buddhist images in China, Korea and Japan. For example,
the Seiryoji Buddha, which was brought to Japan from
K'ai feng in China by Chonen, contained various objects
sealed within a cavity in 985 c.E.49 Besides the objects
themselves, a catalogue was enclosed in the image.
These objects included: inner organs made of textiles,50
the Suvarnaprathe Vajracchedika Prajnipdramita,
and Saddharmapundarika sitras; pictures of
bhasa,
Sakyamuni Buddha, Manjus'r, Samantabhadra and
Maitreya; coins, mirrors, bells, beads, fragments of textiles, as well as a small wooden pole which seems to be
a yasti (srog-shing). A Japanese image of the Bodhisattva Jizo (Ksitigarbha), dated to 1249, which was opened
at the Koln museum in 1983, contained a reliquary that
was not opened, sutras, including the Saddharmapundartka Sutra, dharanis, small images of Sakyamuni, Amitabha and Ksitigarbha, pictures of Amitabha,
etc., as well as a catalogue of its contents.51 A stone
stupa at Pulguksa in Korea contained a Rasmivimala
Dharanl Satra printed in 751 C.E., "reliquary vessels,
Buddhist images, tiny pagodas, incense sticks, pieces of
silk," a bronze mirror, etc. (Goodrich 1967: 377). In 770
C.E. the empress Shotoku of Japan ordered the production of one million small pagodas, each containing one
of four dharanls.52 The Hangchow pagoda in China,
which collapsed in 1924, revealed within its hollow
gzhug-go/ de-nas om vajra-dhdtu-garbhdyaSvdah/ zhes brjodcing rdo-rje'i 'dag-pas stong-pa'i sgo bkag-nas snga-ma bzhindu de rab-tu gnas-par bya'o (Derge Tenjur, vol. 75, pp. 127.5128.1; see also P. vol. 80, p. 111.4.2-6). A version of the Sanskrit text can be found in Lokesh Chandra 1977: 170.5-171.3.
49 Henderson and Hurvitz 1956; and see also Kidder 1972:
127-46.
50 These included heart, lung, liver, kidneys, stomach, intestines, etc.
51 Goepper 1984; see also Cachia 1987.
52 Carter 1955:
46-53; Hickman 1975. Note the importance
of dhdrants in the early history of printing!
256
Journal of the American Oriental Society 115.2 (1995)
bricks tiny printed scrolls of the Guhyadhatu Dharani
Satra dated to 975 C.E. (Edgren 1972).
These examples demonstrate that there were in East
Asia also practices of depositing relics, books, and
dharanis, which, more nearly than the Indian cases
approach in complexity the Tibetan practices criticized
by certain Tibetan authors. The problem of the Indian
origins of these East Asian practices needs to be investigated, as part of the larger historical picture. It is hoped
that further research on the content of Indian stupas and
images also will be carried out, so that the nature of the
Indian influence can be further specified.53
E. A TIBETAN EXAMPLE
In order to illustrate the Tibetan practice of depositing relics and dharanis, I conclude with a translation of
one of the earliest Tibetan passages on the subject that
has come down to us. It was written by Rje-btsun Gragspa-rgyal-mtshan (1147-1216) as part of a work entitled
Arga'i Cho-ga Dang Rab-tu Gnas Don Gsal-ba. In comparison to later Tibetan works, Grags-pa-rgyal-mtshan's
manual is concise. Still, it includes most of the elements
found in later Tibetan ritual works:
The present topic is the method of inserting relics and so
forthinto stfpas so thatthey abide there. In general, there
are four types of relics: 1. bodily relics, 2. bodily relics
which are like mustard seeds, 3. hairs and nails, which
are called relics of the garb, 4. dhdranis, which are called
relics of dharmaktya. The relics of dharmakdyaare the
five dhdranis taughtto be placed in stfpas: Usnisavijaya,
Vimalosnisa, Guhyadhdtukaranda,Bodhigarbhalatikiralaksa, Pratftyasamutpdda.Furthermore,the lamas taught
that writing mantrasendowed with blessings that appear
in the tantrasand sutrasand inserting them so as to abide
[in stfpas] would [produce] immeasurable merit and
great blessings.
As for the levels of abidings of these [relics], even if
there is no space for abiding at the very top [of the stfpa],
one should insert, so as to abide in the upper wheel [of
the stfpa], names, beginning with that of the Buddha up
until one's own root guru, well scented with saffron and
53 It is true that in most cases the content of Indian images
and stfpas had already been removed at the time of excavation.
Yet, not many Indian images have been x-rayed. Seals found
on the backs of images, carrying the verse of the "essence of
InterdependentOrigination" and perhaps other dhdranis need
further research. Evidence for the practice of blessing the
sense-bases (in Tibetan, skye-mched byin-brlab) of Pala-Sena
images is hardly available.
so forth, together with the three letters om ah hum and
with [the formula of] prostration and taking refuge. In
short, write the names of the completely perfect [members] of one's own lineage. Then insert, so as to abide,
the mantrasof one's own yi-dam deity. Om vajra ayuse
svdih is the mantra of a firm life-wood (srog-shing,
yasti), which abides on the four sides of the life-wood or,
in case of something like an image, on its heart. Om sarvavidya svthd is the mantraof Great Knowledge. Insert
it to abide in the harmikaof a stapa or the head of an image. Then in the vase [of a stupa, the bum-pa], insert so
as to abide dhdrani-mantrasof stapa and any dhdrani endowed with blessing.
Further insert, so as to abide, dhdrani-mantras of
Mahfyoga Tantra, then of Yoga Tantra, then of Carya
Tantra, then of Kriya Tantra. If the interior is spacious
and is not filled with dhdranis, insert [dhdranis] in the
upper part of the vase and below that the Tantraand Pitaka sections [of the Kanjur].Also, the dhdrantsinserted
so as to abide on top are the supreme among the tantras,
the so-called heart [mantra, snying-po, hrdaya]54 and
dhdranis. The [specification of] tantras and sitras that
are to be inserted at the base (rmang)55appears in other
ritual works and detailed manuals of rituals.
Even though [some] say that relics of lamas abide in
the harmika, I consider that it accords with the dharma
if they abide as high as possible, since [the lamas] are the
essence of all the Buddhas. If there are [also] relics of the
Tathagata, combine the [relics of the lamas] together
with [the relics of the Tathfgata] without [any distinction
of] superior and inferior, adorn with grain, incense, and
precious substances and insert to abide. One should not
insert into stipas remains of people other than lamas and
supremepersonages.56It appearsfrom the scripturesthat
this would harm sentient beings. If you nevertheless insert remains, examine them carefully, mix them with
clay, make them such that their essence is dhdranis and
relics [see above], make them into tsha-tshas and insert
them to abide. According to my opinion, it is appropriate
if you do so also for supreme personages.
Write dhdrani-mantrasof the dharmaprotectors, such
as Mahfakla, Ganapati,Jambhala,the seventy-five puretype protectors, and so forth. [Make them] abide in the
lotus [throne]; command the protectors. Also insert
the five medicinal herbs, the five grains, the five scents,
54 See Mkhas
grub rje 1968: 117.
55 This is also the name of a
part of the stfpa below the four
steps (the bang-rim bzhi).
56 Also, according to the Vinaya-ksudraka-vastu of the
Dharmaguptaka, "Ne pas enterrer de cadavre sous le stupa
d'un Buddha" (Bareau 1962: 271).
BENTOR: Indian Origins of the Tibetan Practice of Depositing
the five precious substances and the five essences [which
are] the twenty-five extracts.57Then draw the wheels of
the nine yaksas and nine yaksis as they appear in the
Dpa'-bo [Gcig-tu] Grub-pa Tantra.58Glue [the wheels]
with butterand honey, generate them and make pleasing
offerings.
Before anything abides inside [the stfpa or image],
performa short consecration [of the relics and dhdranis].
Then insert them to abide and, finally, attach the bottom
piece [of the stfpa or image] with the wheel[s] which are
made to please the yaksas.
Even though I heard and saw many other procedures
for the abiding of dhdranis, they are not embellished
with scripturalauthority and reasoning. As for this [my
instructions] I consulted tantras and sastras and embellished [my account] with the advice of lama[s], as well.59
57 See Carelli 1941: 17-19; Bentor 1991: 116-17.
58 Toh.
544; Tog Palace 504, vol. 102, p. 973.1-2; see also
Mkhas grub rje 1968: 112-13.
59 Da ni mchod-rten-gyi nang-du ring-bsrel la-sogs-pa
bzhugs-su gzhug-pa'i tshul ni/ spyir ring-bsrel ni rnam-pa bzhi
ste/ sku-gdung-gi ring-bsrel dang/ sku-gdung nyungs [read:
yungs]-'bru Ita-bu'i ring-bsrel dang/ dbu-skra dang sen-mo la
sku-bal-gyi ring-bsrel zhes brjod-pa dang/ gzungs-rams-la
chos-kyi sku'i ring-bsrel zhes brjod-pa yin-no/ chos-kyi sku'i
ring-bsrel-la mchod-rten-gyi nang-du bzhugs-par bshad-pa'i
gzungs Inga yin-te/ gtsug-tor ram-rgyal dang/ gtsug-tor drimed/ gsang-ba'i ring-bsrel za-ma-tog/ byang-chub snying-po
rgyan 'bum/ rten-'brel snying-po-rnams yin-no/ gzhan-yang
gsang-sngags-kyi rgyud-sde dang/ mdo-sde-nas 'byung-ba'i
sngags byin-rlabs-can-rnams bris-nas bzhugs-su bcug-na
bsod-nams dpag-tu med-cing byin-rlabs che'o-zhes bla-marnams gsung-ngo/ de-dag bzhugs-pa'i rim-pa ni/ tog dang togla bzhugs sa med-na-'ang/ 'khor-lo'i thog-mar sangs-rgyas-nas
bzung-nas bdag-gi rtsa-ba'i bla-ma'i bar-gyi mtshan-rnams/
gur-gum la-sogs-pa'i dri bzang-pos yi-ge gsum dang spel-pa'am/phyag-'tshal-zhing skyabs-su 'gro-ba dang bcas-pa spel-la
bzhugs-su gzhug/ mdor-na rang-gi brgyud-pa-rnamsyongs-su
rdzogs-pa'i mtshan bri'o/ de-nas rang-gi yi-dam-gyi lha'i
gsang-sngags-rnams bzhugs-su gzhug-go/ Om vajra dyuse
Svdhd/ zhes bya-ba ni srog-shing brtan-pa'i sngags yin-te/
srog-shing-gi phyogs bzhi dang/ sku-gzugs Ita-buyin-na thugskar bzhugs-so/ Om sarva-vidyd Sviha zhes bya-ba ni rig-pa
chen-mo'i sngags yin-te/ mchod-rten-gyi bre dang sku-gzugskyi dbur bzhugs-su gzhug-go/ de-nas bum-par mchod-rten-gyi
gzungs-sngags dang/ gzungs byin-rlabs-can mtha'-dag bzhugssu gzhug-ste/ de-'ang thog-mar ral-'byor chen-po'i rgyud-kyi/
de-nas ral-'byor-gyi rgyud-kyi/ de-nas spyod-pa'i rgyud-kyi/
de-nas bya-ba'i rgyud-kyi gzungs-sngags-rnams bzhugs-su
gzhug-ste/ nang yangs-shing gzungs-kyis ma khengs-na/ bum
Relics
257
The types of relics listed here are identical to those
known in India, with the exception of a further division
of bodily relics.60 The list of dhAranfs covers five of the
dharani sutras discussed above. These relics are deposited within stupas or images according to a hierarchical
order which reflects the relative holiness of these sacred
objects, an interesting subject in its own right. A more
detailed discussion of the content of Tibetan stupas and
images is the subject of another study that I am presently preparing. Here, only the fifth category of relics,
common especially among the Bka'-brgyud-pa and
Rnying-ma-pa, will be mentioned.61 These are the relics
stod yan-chad-du de-dag bzhugs-su bcug-la/ de man-chad-du
rgyud-sde dang sde-snod-rnams bzhugs-su gzhug-go/ de-'ang
gzungs-rnams stod-du bzhugs-su gzhug-pa ni snying-po-'am
gzungs/ zhes bya-ba rgyud-rnams-kyinang-nas dam-pa yin-la/
rgyud-rnamsdang mdo-sde-rnams rmang-du bzhugs-su gzhugpa ni cho-ga dang las-tshogs phra-mo'i cho-ga dang bya-ba'i
rnam-grangs gzhan 'byung-bas-so/ bla-ma-rnams-kyi gdungmams ni brer bzhugs-so zhes-kyang zer-na/ ji-ltar mtho-bar
bzhugs-na chos dang mthun-par mthong-ste/ sangs-rgyas
thams-cad-kyi ngo-bo yin-pa'i phyir-ro/ de-bzhin gshegs-pa'i
ring-bsrel yod-na de-dang Ihan-cig mtho dman med-par
sbams-te 'bru dang spos dang rin-po-ches brgyan-la bzhugs-su
gzhug-go/ bla-ma dang gang-zag mchog ma gtogs-pa'i rus-bu
mchod-rten-gyi nang-du gzhug-par mi bya-ste/ sems-can de-la
gnod-par 'gyur-ro/ zhes lung-las 'byung-ngo/ cis-kyang 'jugna-'ang rus-bu zhib-par btags-la 'jim-pa dang bsres-te gzungskyi ring-bsrel-gyi snying-po can-du byas-la sdtstshar btab-ste
bzhugs-su gzhug-go/ gang-zag mchog-rnams-la-'ang de-ltar
byas-na legs-so snyam-du sems-so/ padmar nag-po chen-po
dang/ tshogs-kyi bdag-po dang/jambhala dang gtsang-rigs-kyi
mgon-po bdun-cu rtsa-lnga la-sogs-pa chos-skyong-ba-rnamskyi gzungs-sngags bris-la bzhugs-te srung-mar bsgo'o/ gzhanyang sman-lnga dang/'bru Inga dang/ dri Inga dang/ rin-poche Inga dang/ snying-po Inga ste/ bcud nyi-shu rtsa-lnga-'ang
gzhug-go/ de-nas dpa'-bo grub-pa'i rgyud-nas 'byung-ba bzhin
gnod-sbyin pho dgu mo dgu'i 'khor-lo bris-la/ mar dang
sbrang-rtsis bar-bsdams-te/ bskyed-la mnyes-pa'i mchod-pa
bya'o/ nang-du bzhugs-pa thams-cad sngon-la rab-tu gnas-pa
mdor bsdus-pa byas-la/ de-nas gdod bzhugs-su gzhug-par
bya'o/ de-nas gnod-sbyin mnyes-par byas-pa'i 'khor-los zhabs
bsdam-mo/ gzungs bzhugs-pa'i rim-pa gzhan kho-bos mang-du
thos-zhing mthong mod-kyi/ lung dang rigs-pas ma brgyan-la
'di ni rgyud dang bstan-bcos-las-kyang mthong-zhing blama'i man-ngag-gis-kyang brgyan-pa yin-no (Grags-pa-rgyalmtshan, pp. 240.3.6-241.2.5).
60 On Tibetan classifications of relics, see Bentor (forthcoming).
61 Chos-kyi-grags-pa (pp. 281-83), Padma-'phin-las 305),
(p.
Kong-sprul (p. 102).
258
Journal of the American Oriental Society 115.2 (1995)
of the dharmaktya (chos-kyi sku'i ring-bsrel), as distinguished from relics of the dharma (i.e., dhdranis and
books). The relics of the dharmakaya are small stupas
and tsha-tshas,62which are said to symbolize the dharmakaya. We have seen above (? A) that the theories on
the multiple bodies of the Buddha, among their other
manifold implications, explain the worship of the physical relics of the Buddha, which are attributed to the
Form Body. Interestingly, according to the fivefold
concept of relics, also the dharmakaya (the Non-form
Body) came to have relics.
CONCLUSIONS
Indian and Tibetan stfpas and images have contained
a variety of items, all of which are classified as relics:
repositories of the body, speech, and mind of the Buddha, offerings, and 'omens'. Upon his death, the Buddha
left behind two legacies: his physical relics and the
body of his teachings. Various teachings have located
the absent Buddha either in his physical remains or in
his words. Later also, images served to locate the Buddha in the samsaric world. Concepts of relics may have
developed further because of tensions between these
various views. They were also influenced by trends emphasizing the power of mantras and dharanis. Possibly
also, problems of access to the physical relics or to sites
housing them influenced a particular stand.63It should
62
Smallclay tablesstampedby molds,herein the shapeof
stipas.
63
Accordingto Schopen1975,problemsthatnew sects had
of access to majorBuddhistsites in Indiawere importantfor
be noted, however, that in Tibet the problem that physical relics of the Buddha were in short supply was
solved by means of 'multiplying relics'.64Hence Gragspa-rgyal-mtshan assumes that one may deposit a relic
of the Tathagata (see above). However, the various answers to the question of locating the Buddha 'gone to
nirvana'were synthesized. Already in India, both stupas
and images had been made that contained both physical
and dharma relics, thereby encompassing the various
trends. In Tibet the different types of relics which had
evolved throughoutthe history of Buddhism came to be
used for sacralizing stuipasand images. With regard to
the question of the Indian origins of Tibetan practice,
the various types of relics deposited in Tibetan stufpas
and images, with the possible exception of mustard
seed like relics,65 have precedence in India. They are
found in archaeological excavations of stupas and images, and are mentioned in Buddhist scriptures and in
testimonies of Chinese pilgrims to India. Yet, even
though the process of synthesizing the various deposits
can be found already in India, it did not reach there the
degree of elaboration it would acquire in Tibet. We can
say that the basic notions of the Tibetan practice are
certainly based on Indian precedents. But the comprehensive nature of the Tibetan practice is yet another indication of the elaborate and comprehensive nature of
Tibetan Buddhism.
the developmentof a new type of shrine in the early
Mahayana.
64 In Tibetan:'phel-gdung;
see Bentor,forthcoming;Martin
1992.
65 Cf. Martin 1992.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Tibetan Works
Abhayakaragupta. Vajrdvali-ndma-mandala-updyikd[mandalopiyikd]. Dkyil-'khor-gyi cho-ga rdo-rje phreng-ba zhes
bya-ba. Toh. 3140, P. #3961.
Chos-kyi-grags-pa,
Bri-gungRig-'dzin(b. 1595) ['Bri-gungpa], "Ring-bsrellnga'i bzhugs-tshullag-len tshogs-gnyis
rgya-mtsho." Sku-gzugs-kyi thig-rtsa dang gsar-rnying
rgyud-sde rgya-mtsho'i thig-rtsa gzungs-'bul lag-len bcas
(Gangtok,1985),271-331.
Dalai Lama V, Ngag-dbang-blo-bzang-rgya-mtsho
(16171682) [Dge-lugs-pa], "Gzu-gnas blo-ldan ngo-mtshar
skyed-byedgzungs-'bul-gyilag-len'khrul-spong
nyin-mor
byed-pa."Ritualsof Rdo-rje-brag(Leh, 1973), 1:389-437
(missingfolio 3 andpartof folio 12 and 25. A complete
version is found in the Library of the Tibetan Works and
Archives in Dharamsala, acc. no. pa 1053).
Grags-pa-rgyal-mtshan (1147-1216) [Sa-skya-pa], "Arga'i
cho-ga dang rab-tu gnas-pa don gsal-ba." The Complete
Worksof the Great Masters of the Sa Skya Sect of the
TibetanBuddhism (The Toyo Bunko, Tokyo, 1968),
4:237-52.
'Jam-dbyangs-bzhad-pa II Dkon-mchog-'jigs-med-dbang-po
(1728-1791) [Dge-lugs-pa] "Mdo-rgyudbstan-bcos du-manas 'byung-ba'ichos-kyi rnam-grangsshes-ldan yid-kyi dga'ston." Collected Worksvol. 7 (New Delhi, 1972).
BENTOR: Indian Origins of the Tibetan Practice of Depositing
Kong-sprul Blo-gros-mtha'-yas, 'Jam-mgon (1813-1899)
[Bka'-brgyud-pa/Ris-med], "Rten-la nang-gzhug 'bul-ba'i
lag-len lugs-srol kun-gsal dri-bral nor-bu chu-shel-gyi melong." Collected Works (Paro, 1975), 12:97-148.
Krang-dbyi-sun (Chang I-sun), ed., Bod-rgya Tshig-mdzod
Chen-mo (Beijing, 1985).
Lcang-skya I Ngag-dbang-[blo-bzang]-chos-ldan (1642-1714)
[Dge-lugs-pa], "Gzungs-'jug lugs dang dpar-byang." Collected Works in The Tibetan Tripitaka Peking edition
[extra volumes] (Tokyo-Kyoto, 1961), no. 6301, pp.
89.2.5-90.2.1.
Mkhas-grub Rje. Mkhas Grub Rje's Fundamentals of the Buddhist Tantras, tr. Ferdinand D. Lessig and Alex Wayman
(The Hague, 1968; reprinted: Delhi: Motilal Barnarsidass,
1983).
Padma-'phrin-las, Rdo-rje-brag Rig-'dzin (1641-1717) [Rnying-ma-pa], "Gzungs-'bul-gyi lag-len gsal-bar byed-pa baidfr-ya'i me-long." Rituals of Rdo-rje-brag (Leh, 1973),
1:287-362.
Pan-chen Bla-ma I Blo-bzang-chos-kyi-rgyal-mtshan (15701662) [Dge-lugs-pa], "Gzungs-gzhug gnod-sbyin 'khor-lo
ji-ltar bya-ba'i tshul gsal-byed nor-bu'i me-long." Collected Works(New Delhi, 1973), 4:799-811.
Other Works
Bareau, Andr6. 1962. "La construction et le culte des stupa
d'apres les Vinayapitaka." Bulletin de l'Ecole franqaise
d'Extreme-Orient50:230-74.
Bentor, Yael. 1988. "The Redactions of the Adbhutadharmaparyaya from Gilgit." The Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 11.2:21-52.
. 1991. The Indo-Tibetan Buddhist Consecration Ritual
_
for Stfipas, Images, Books and Temples (Ph.D. diss., Indiana University).
.Forthcoming. "Tibetan Relic Classifications." The
Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International
Association for Tibetan Studies (Held in Fagernes, August
21-28, 1992).
_ . In preparation. "On the Contents of Tibetan Images
and Stipas."
Boucher, Daniel. 1991. "The Pratftyasamutpadagdthaand Its
Role in the Medieval Cult of the Relics." The Journal of the
International Association of Buddhist Studies 14.1:1-27.
Biihnemann, Gudrun. 1992. "Some Remarks on the Date of
Abhayakaragupta and the Chronology of His Works"
ZDMG 142:120-27.
Cachia, Francis. 1987. "The Museum as a Medium of CrossCultural Communication."Museum 39:8-14.
Carelli, Mario E. 1941. SekoddeSatikdof Nadapada (Ndropa)
(Baroda: Oriental Institute).
Carter, T. F. 1955. The Invention of Printing in China and its
Spread Westward, 2nd ed. (New York: Ronald Press Co.),
46-53.
Relics
259
Chandra, G. C., and K. N. Dikshit. 1936. "Excavations at Paharpur."Annual Reports of the Archaeological Survey of
India for the Years 1930-31, 1931-32, 1932-33 & 193334 (Delhi: Manager of Publications, 113-28).
Collins, Steven. 1992. "Nirvana, Time, and Narrative." History of Religions 31:215-46.
Dagyab, Loden Sherap. 1977. Tibetan Religious Art, 2 vols.
(Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz).
Dikshit, R. B. K. N. 1938. "Excavations of Paharpur,Bengal."
Memoirs of the Archaeological Survey of India (New
Delhi: Archaeological Survey of India).
Eckel, Malcolm David. 1985. "Gratitudeto an Empty Saviour:
A Study of the Concept of Gratitude in Mahayana Buddhist Philosophy." History of Religions 25:57-75.
. 1992. To See the Buddha (San Francisco: Harper).
Edgren, Soren. 1972. "The Printed Dhfrani-Sftra of A.D.
956." Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities
(Stockholm) 44:141-46.
Emmerick, R. E. 1970. The Sutra of Golden Light: Being a
Translation of the Suvarnabhdsottamasutra (London:
Luzac & Company).
Falk, Nancy. 1977. "To Gaze on the Sacred Traces." History
of Religions 16.4:281-93.
Goepper, Roger. 1984. Die Seele des Jiz6: Weihegaben im
Inneren einer buddhistischen Statue (Koln: Museum fur
Ostasiatische Kunst, Kleine Monographien, no. 3).
Goodrich,L. Carrington.1967. "Printing:PreliminaryReporton
a New Discovery." Technology and Culture 8:376-78.
Harrison, Paul. 1992. "Is the Dharma-kaya the Real 'Phantom
Body' of the Buddha?" The Journal of the International
Association of Buddhist Studies 15:44-94.
. Forthcoming. English translation of the Pratyutpannabuddhasammukhavasthitasamadhi-sutra.Bukky6 DendO
Ky6kai English Translation of the Chinese Tripitaka.
Harvey, Peter. 1990. "VeneratedObjects and Symbols of Early
Buddhism." In Symbols in Art and Religion: The Indian
and the Comparative Perspectives, ed., Karl Werner (London: Curzon Press. Pp. 68-102).
Henderson, Gregory, and Leon Hurvitz. 1956. "The Buddha
of Seiryoji." Artibus Asiae 19:5-55.
Hickman, Brian. 1975. "A Note of the Hyakumant6Dharani."
MonumentaNipponica 30:87-93.
von Hiniiber, Oskar. 1987-88. "Dharanis aus Zentralasien."
Indologica Taurinensia 14:231-49.
Hsuan Tsang. 1968. Si-yu-ki: Buddhist Records of the Western World, tr. Samuel Beal (Boston: Kegan Paul Trench,
Triibner& Co. Ltd., 1885) [rpt., New York: Paragon Book
Reprint Corp.].
I-Tsing (I Ching). 1896. A Record of the Buddhist Religion, tr.
J. Takakusu (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Jampa Samten. 1992. "Preliminary Notes on the Phug-brag
bKa'-'gyur: A Unique Edition of the Tibetan Buddhist
Canon." Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the 5th Seminar of
260
Journal of the American Oriental Society 115.2 (1995)
the International Association for Tibetan Studies, Narita,
1989 (Narita: Naritasan Shinshoji), 115-20.
de Jong, J. W. 1984. "A New History of Tantric Literature
in India" [pr6cis of Matsunaga Yukei, Mikkyo kyoten
seiritsushi-ron (Kyoto, 1980)]. Indo Koten Kenkyu [Acta
Indologica] 6:91-113.
Kajiyama, Yuichi. 1985. "Stipas, the Mother of Buddhas, and
Dharma-body." In New Paths in Buddhist Research, ed.
Anthony K. Warder (Durham, N.C.: Acorn Press).
Kidder, J. Edward. 1972. Early Buddhist Japan (New York:
Praeger Publishers).
Kottkamp, Heino. 1992. Der Stupa als Reprasentation des
buddhistischen Heilsweges (Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz).
Lalou, Marcelle. 1957. "Hold or Retain?" East and West
7:328-29.
Lamotte, ltienne. 1949-80. Le Traite de la grande vertu de
sagesse (Louvain: Universit6 de Louvain).
Lancaster, Lewis R. 1974. "An Early Mahayana Sermon about
the Body of the Buddha and the Making of Images." Artibus Asiae 36:287-91.
1981. "LiterarySources for a Study of Barabudur."In
Barabudur: History and Significance of a Buddhist Monument, ed. Luis O. G6mez and Hiram W. Woodward
(Berkeley: University of California), 195-205.
Liebenthal, Walter. 1947. "SanskritInscriptions from Yunnan,
I." Monumenta Serica 12:1-40.
Lokesh Chandra. 1977. Vajrdvalt [of Abhayakaragupta](New
Delhi: Mrs. SharadaRani).
Lopez, Donald S. 1988. The Heart Sutra Explained (New
York: S.U.N.Y. Press).
Martin, Dan. 1992. "Crystals and Images from Bodies, Hearts
and Tongues from Fire: Points of Relic Controversyfrom Tibetan History." In Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the 5th
Seminarof the InternationalAssociationfor TibetanStudies,
Narita, 1989 (Narita:NaritasanShinshoji, 183-91).
.Forthcoming. "Tables of Contents (dkar-chag)." In
Essays on Tibetan Literature: Festschrift for Geshe Sopa
(tentative title), ed. Roger Jackson and Jose I. Cabez6n
(Snow Lion).
Mitomo, Ryojun. 1984. "An Aspect of Dharma-Sarira."IBK
32.2:(4)-(9).
Mitra, Debala. 1981-83. Ratnagiri (1958-61), 2 vols. Memoirs
of the Archaeological Survey of India, no. 80 (New Delhi:
The Director General, Archaeological Survey of India).
Nagao, Gadjin. 1973. "On the Theory of Buddha-Body
(Buddha-kaya)." The Eastern Buddhist 6.1:25-53.
Rahula, Walpola. 1956. History of Buddhism in Ceylon
(Colombo: M. D. Gunasena & Co. Ltd.).
Ramachandran,T. N. 1953. "Nagarjunakonda1938." Memoirs
of the Archaeological Survey of India, no. 71 (Delhi: Manager of Publications, Government of India).
Reynolds, Frank E. 1977. "The Several Bodies of Buddha:
Reflections on a Neglected Aspect of Theravada Tradition." History of Religions 16.4:374-89.
Salomon, Richard, and Gregory Schopen. 1984. "The Indravarman (Avaca) Casket Inscription Reconsidered: Further
Evidence for Canonical Passages in Buddhist Inscriptions." Journal of the International Association of Buddhist
Studies 7.1:107-23.
Scherrer Schaub, Cristina A. Forthcoming. "Some Dhdrani
Written on Paper Functioning as Dharmakdya'sRelics and
destined to be placed in a Caitya / Stfpa: A Tentative Approach to PT 350." A paper submitted to the Proceedings of
the Sixth Conference of the International Association for
Tibetan Studies (Fagernes, August 21-28, 1992).
Schopen, Gregory. 1975. "The Phrase 'sa prthivipradeSas caityabhito bhavet' in the Vajracchedikd:Notes on the Cult of
the Book in Mahayana."Indo-Iranian Journal 17:147-81.
. 1978. "The Five Leaves of the Buddhabaladhaanirdesa-satra Found at Gilgit."
napratiharyavikurvan
Journal of Indian Philosophy 5:319-36.
1982. "The Text on the 'Dharani Stones from Abhayagiriya':A Minor Contributionto the Study of MahayanaLiteraturein Ceylon." Journal of the InternationalAssociation
of Buddhist Studies 5:100-108.
. 1985. "The Bodhigarbhalaikaralaksaand Vimalosnisa
Dharanisin IndianInscriptions:Two Sources for the Practice
of Buddhism in Medieval India." Wiener Zeitschriftfur die
Kunde Sudasiens 29:119-49.
. 1987. "Burial 'Ad Sanctos' and the Physical Presence
of the Buddha in Early Indian Buddhism: A Study in the
Archaeology of Religions." Religion 17:193-225.
_
. 1988. "On the Buddha and His Bones: The Conception of a Relic in the Inscriptions from Nagarjunikonda."
JAOS 108:527-37.
. 1991. "An Old Inscription from Amaravati and the
Cult of the Local Monastic Dead in Indian Buddhist Monasteries." The Journal of the International Association of
Buddhist Studies 14.2:281-329.
. 1993. "Ritual Rights and Bones of Contention: More
on Monastic Funerals and Relics in the MilasarvistivddaVinaya."Journal of Indian Philosophy 21:205-54.
Snellgrove, David L. 1987. Indo-Tibetan Buddhism: Indian
Buddhists and Their Tibetan Successors, 2 vols. (Boston:
Shambhala).
Taddei, Maurizio. 1970. "Inscribed Clay Tablets and Miniature Stupas from Gasni." East and West 20:70-86.
Trainor,Kevin Michael. 1990. TheRelics of the Buddha:A Study
of the Cult of Relic Veneration in the TheravddaBuddhist
Traditionof Sri Lanka (Ph.D. diss., Columbia University).
Tucci, Giuseppe. 1932. 'Mchod rten' e 'tsha tsha' nel Tibet indiano ed occidentale. Indo-Tibetica, vol. 1 (Rome: Reale
Accademia d'Italia). Tr. Uma Marina Vesci, Stupa, ed.,
BENTOR:
Indian Origins of the Tibetan Practice of Depositing Relics
Lokesh Chandra, Satapitaka Series (New Delhi: Aditya
Prakashan, 1988).
____
, 1959. "A Tibetan Classification of Buddhist Images,
according to their Style." Artibus Asiae 22:179-87.
Walshe, Maurice. 1987. Thus Have I Heard: The Long Discourses of the Buddha (Digha Nikaya) (London: Wisdom
Publications).
Williams, Paul. 1989. Mahaydna Buddhism: The Doctrinal
Foundations (London: Routledge).
261
Winternitz, Maurice. 1939. A History of Indian Literature, tr.
S. Ketkar and H. Kohn (Calcutta: Univ. of Calcutta; rpt.
New Delhi, Oriental Books Corporation).
Yuyama, Akira. 1989. "Die Sanskrit-texte in Laf-tsha und in
tibetischer (dbu-can) Schrift auf der im Jahre 1346 gegossenen Glocke des tempels Yeon-bog-jeol in Korea." In
XXIII. Deutscher Orientalistentag, ed., Einar von Schuler,
ZDMG Supplements VII (Stuttgart:Franz Steiner Verlag).