Difference between revisions of "Ñāṇodaya"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with " It is said that while living in India he composed the Ñāṇodaya and the Atthasālinī, and also began to write a concise commentary (Parittaṭṭhakathā...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {{DisplayImages|441}} | ||
| − | It is said that while living in [[India]] he composed the [[Ñāṇodaya]] and the [[Atthasālinī]], and also began to write a concise commentary ([[Parittaṭṭhakathā]]) on the [[Tripiṭaka]] ([[Pāli]], [[Tipiṭaka]]). | + | |
| + | |||
| + | [[Ñāṇodaya]]; It is said that while living in [[India]] he composed the [[Ñāṇodaya]] and the [[Atthasālinī]], and also began to write a concise commentary ([[Parittaṭṭhakathā]]) on the [[Tripiṭaka]] ([[Pāli]], [[Tipiṭaka]]). | ||
[[Buddhaghosa]] apparently prepared a treatise called [[Ñāṇodaya]], of which nothing is known, and an [[Aṭṭhasālinī]], a commentary on the [[Dhammasaṅgaṇī]]. The [[existing]] commentary by [[Buddhaghosa]] on the [[Dhammasaṅgaṇī]] is indeed called the [[Aṭṭhasālinī]], but it is not known if this had any [[relation]] to the earlier work, if indeed it ever existed. | [[Buddhaghosa]] apparently prepared a treatise called [[Ñāṇodaya]], of which nothing is known, and an [[Aṭṭhasālinī]], a commentary on the [[Dhammasaṅgaṇī]]. The [[existing]] commentary by [[Buddhaghosa]] on the [[Dhammasaṅgaṇī]] is indeed called the [[Aṭṭhasālinī]], but it is not known if this had any [[relation]] to the earlier work, if indeed it ever existed. | ||
| + | {{R}} | ||
| + | http://santifm.org/santipada/2010/the-dipava%E1%B9%81sa/ | ||
| + | [[Category:Buddhaghosa]] | ||
Latest revision as of 06:29, 22 January 2016
Ñāṇodaya; It is said that while living in India he composed the Ñāṇodaya and the Atthasālinī, and also began to write a concise commentary (Parittaṭṭhakathā) on the Tripiṭaka (Pāli, Tipiṭaka).
Buddhaghosa apparently prepared a treatise called Ñāṇodaya, of which nothing is known, and an Aṭṭhasālinī, a commentary on the Dhammasaṅgaṇī. The existing commentary by Buddhaghosa on the Dhammasaṅgaṇī is indeed called the Aṭṭhasālinī, but it is not known if this had any relation to the earlier work, if indeed it ever existed.
