Articles by alphabetic order
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Â Ā Ḍ Ḥ Ī Ḷ Ṃ Ṇ Ñ Ṅ Ṛ Ṣ Ś Ṭ Ū Ö Ō
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0


Is a contradiction the rejection of logic by Denis Wallez

From Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia is now 14 years old

Our Encyclopedia recently received a wonderful opportunity for a major renewal on its 14th birthday . After many years of growing our Encyclopedia had become bit slow and sometimes even decided not to answer when people knocked on the door.

A very big thank you and blessings to Dmytro Rudiy (rudiy.nl) for his great work in upgrading the server, website and all of the infrastructure and helping make TBE fast and reliable again for everyone!

We kindly ask our readers to help us cover the cost of this important upgrade and also help with the ongoing costs of keeping the Encyclopedia alive and freely available.
Donate with PayPalor cardDonate by card (Visa, Mastercard, American Express)
Every little donation helps and every one is deeply appreciated. 🙏🙏🙏
OM AH HUM VAJRA GURU PADMA SIDDHI HUM 🙏🙏🙏
May blessings shower down on all of yous 🙏🙏🙏

Is a contradiction the rejection of logic by Denis Wallez

Is a contradiction the rejection of logic, or the very conclusion of logic properly used?

In 2007, C. W. Huntington, Jr. published "The nature of the Mādhyamaka trick" (http://www.smith.edu/buddhism/docs/huntington-madhyamika-trick.pdf) in which he reviews recent works presenting Nāgārjuna's contribution through the lens of modern symbolic logic.

He notably argues that modern assumptions prejudice our understanding of Nāgārjuna’s insistence that he has no ��proposition��. While doing so, Huntington seems to present mādhyamikas as rejecting reasoning, distrusting logic and not offering much arguments.

In 2008, Jay L. Garfield replied with "Turning a Madhyamaka Trick: Reply to Huntington" (http://www.smith.edu/buddhism/docs/garfield-turning-a-madhyamaka-trick.pdf). Garfield demonstrates that Nāgārjuna and Candrakīrti do deploy arguments.

In some sense, the debate is about the prāsaṅgika tradition and its reliance on the reductio ad absurdum: is a contradiction the rejection of logic, or the very conclusion of logic properly used?

A three-day symposium "Madhyamaka and Methodology" at Smith College extended the debate, with videos available online (http://www.smith.edu/buddhism/event-mmsymp.php). Happy watching!

Source

[1]