Articles by alphabetic order
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Â Ā Ḍ Ḥ Ī Ḷ Ṃ Ṇ Ñ Ṅ Ṛ Ṣ Ś Ṭ Ū Ö Ō
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0


Satyasiddhi Śāstra

From Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia
(Redirected from Jōjitsu-ron)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia is now 14 years old

Our Encyclopedia recently received a wonderful opportunity for a major renewal on its 14th birthday . After many years of growing our Encyclopedia had become bit slow and sometimes even decided not to answer when people knocked on the door.

A very big thank you and blessings to Dmytro Rudiy (rudiy.nl) for his great work in upgrading the server, website and all of the infrastructure and helping make TBE fast and reliable again for everyone!

We kindly ask our readers to help us cover the cost of this important upgrade and also help with the ongoing costs of keeping the Encyclopedia alive and freely available.
Donate with PayPalor cardDonate by card (Visa, Mastercard, American Express)
Every little donation helps and every one is deeply appreciated. 🙏🙏🙏
OM AH HUM VAJRA GURU PADMA SIDDHI HUM 🙏🙏🙏
May blessings shower down on all of yous 🙏🙏🙏

Satyasiddhi Śāstra

Satyasiddhi-śāstra , (Sanskrit: True Attainment Treatise), treatise in 202 chapters on the doctrine of the void (śūnya). The work stands as a philosophical bridge between Hīnayāna, or Theravāda, Buddhism, the form predominant in Sri Lanka (Ceylon) and Southeast Asia, and Mahāyāna Buddhism, the tradition predominant in East Asia. The author, Harivarman, a central Indian Brahman in origin, studied both Hīnayāna and Mahāyāna. The Chinese translation is entitled Ch’eng-shih Lun and the Japanese Jōjitsu-ron.

The Satyasiddhi-śāstra argues strongly against the absolute existence or ultimate ontological reality of any phenomenon. It was probably written in the early 4th century and was translated into Chinese at the start of the 5th century. In China it gave rise to the Satyasiddhi school, which was considered to be Hīnayānist, although the Satyasiddhi-śāstra itself was regarded in China as a Mahāyāna treatise. The text’s Sanskrit original has perished, as have all commentaries on the work.

Source

www.britannica.com