Paradox
Tibetan Buddhist Encyclopedia is now 14 years old
Our Encyclopedia recently received a wonderful opportunity for a major renewal on its 14th birthday . After many years of growing our Encyclopedia had become bit slow and sometimes even decided not to answer when people knocked on the door.
A very big thank you and blessings to Dmytro Rudiy (rudiy.nl) for his great work in upgrading the server, website and all of the infrastructure and helping make TBE fast and reliable again for everyone!
We kindly ask our readers to help us cover the cost of this important upgrade and also help with the ongoing costs of keeping the Encyclopedia alive and freely available.
or card
Every little donation helps and every one is deeply appreciated. 🙏🙏🙏
OM AH HUM VAJRA GURU PADMA SIDDHI HUM 🙏🙏🙏
May blessings shower down on all of yous 🙏🙏🙏
A paradox is a thing, situation or statement having two contradictory elements which make it appear strange, and an enigma is something mysterious or difficult to understand. While the Buddha’s behaviour and pronouncements were always consistent and clear, he occasionally said paradoxical and enigmatic things. Once someone asked him how he crossed the stream, i.e. attained enlightenment, and he replied, ‘Without hurrying and without delaying.’ (S.I,1). On another occasion a horse trainer mentioned to him that if, after a long period, a horse did not submit to training he would destroy it. He then asked the Buddha how he trained his monks. The Buddha described the methods he used and then the trainer asked, ‘And if the monk does not respond to the training what do you do?’ The Buddha replied, ‘I destroy him.’ (A.II,112). In the first of these statements apparent paradox is being used because sometimes normal language is inadequate to transmit a subtle idea; in this case, there needs to be a balance between exertion and relaxation although it is difficult to describe just when to cease doing one and commence doing another. In the Buddha’s second statement, paradox (i.e. between his well-known teachings of respect for all life and his claim that he would ‘destroy’ someone) was clearly meant to grab the questioner’s attention by causing shock. Having done this, the Buddha then went on to explain to his questioner what he meant by ‘destroy.’ If a monk was undisciplined and continually refused to heed the Buddha’s advice, he would just ignore him which would be tantamount to being destroyed spiritually.
A few of the Buddha’s statements are very difficult to understand and in that sense are truly enigmatic. For example, once he said: ‘Cut down the forest but not the tree.’ (Dhp.283), and on another occasion he commented: ‘It pours on the covered but not on the open. So open the covered and you won’t be poured on.’ (Ud.56).